Guest Blogger: Bill Donohue
I have a confession to make. I have
plagiarized. On Friday, January 20, 2017, at approximately 11:23 a.m., I
committed an act of plagiarism—right in front of my composition students. I am
a plagiarist. Turnitin told me that my writing submission was 80% similar, to use Turnitin’s term, to
resources that that Turnitin used to check against my writing. As a matter of
fact, all my students plagiarized that day.
Before you go snitching on us to
the plagiarism police, the act of plagiarism was a demonstration. For the first
time in my teaching career, I am using the Turnitin software as a component of
the teaching of writing. And thanks to the Turnitin workshop sponsored by CETL
and ATS (Thanks Anna and Nancy ;-), I have a solid understanding of how the
program works, and I how I can avoid the pitfalls that kept me from using
Turnitin in the past.
This post is going to get long;
so if you have had enough reading for a Saturday morning, here are a few
discussion questions:
What is your experience with
plagiarism in your courses?
How have you handled plagiarism?
How do you teach students to
engage with sources?
What advice do you have for a
teacher who has not used Turnitin?
To be clear, my aim has always
been to teach students how to write; how to gather, understand, and use
information; and how to use information responsibly. My courses have defined
plagiarism, discussed plagiarism, reviewed examples of plagiarism, focused on
citation conventions, and generally expanded the student’s knowledge about
plagiarism. (Students are always surprised by the issues of minimal citations
for paraphrases and self-plagiarism). I create assignments that limit the
opportunities to plagiarize. I try to reason with the students by telling them
that to become better writers, they need to do the work and receive feedback on
that work. If I am giving feedback to work that someone else did or that was
copied and pasted from an internet source, then the students are not becoming
better writers. I also develop grading systems so that students are not focused
on the grade but the writing itself. Finally, I do give the penalty lecture. I
talk about how a professor’s job isn’t just to teach, but to create new
knowledge. If someone steals those ideas as their own, they are stealing from
me. And I review the sanctions for someone caught plagiarizing that can lead to
expulsion!
The notion of plagiarism as theft,
and using detection software to police that crime, has never sat well with me
as it puts the teacher and student in an adversarial position that does not aid
in the teaching of writing. When I have caught someone plagiarizing, the most egregious
examples are intentional plagiarism, which is not difficult for me to detect. A
google search provides the evidence for me to confront the student. This is
never a pleasant experience for both the student and myself. It can provide a
teachable moment, and I do my best to work with the student.
Unintentional plagiarism, if it
is considered plagiarism at all or rather the
misuse of sources, is easier to contend with, although more
difficult to detect and labor intensive in some cases. Most often, the citation
convention is not employed correctly and the feedback mechanism can indicate to
the student the issue without having to be adversarial. The adversarial
positioning is one reason why The Conference on College Composition and
Communication (CCCC) passed a resolution denouncing the use of plagiarism
detection software (
http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resolutions/2013).
Other issues with the use of the software are undermining student agency,
threating privacy and intellectual property, ineffectiveness of detection, and
distraction from teaching students how to write from sources.
Research, such as the Citation
Project (
http://site.citationproject.net/),
has shown that instances of intentional plagiarism are quite low and that the
larger issue is how students are engaging with the source material they are
trying to use. Students need to be taught how to use source material. A focus
on reading skills, especially when the subject is unfamiliar or complex as in
upper division major courses, can aid students in synthesizing sourced ideas
into their own arguments in deep and meaningful ways. Better understanding of
the topic being written about and what the research says about those topics
leads to better integration of ideas and less patch-writing. This approach is
more labor intensive as class time, written feedback, and individual
conferences may be needed to provide the proper amount of instruction. (Writing
Centers are also useful for this instruction.)
So why am I using Turnitin this
semester? Partly, I am doing so because other professors are using the
software. As a composition teacher teaching a subject that has a heavy burden
of service, I want to make sure students have an awareness and an understanding
of the tool so they can use it effectively to aid in their writing. Similar to
my warning that plagiarism can have consequences, the use of Turnitin may
dissuade a student from intentional plagiarism and compel them to give a more
honest, if flawed, attempt at the writing assignment that creates a space for
learning.
I use many of the best practices
for teaching writing in regards to source work as outlined by CCCC and the
Writing Program Administrators (
http://wpacouncil.org/positions/WPAplagiarism.pdf). One
of those is the creation of assignments that resist plagiarism. An example is
from the Integrated Writing and Reading course. Students read
A Lesson Before Dying, and an assignment
is to write a characterization of five main characters. The intention is for
students to use their reading skills to gain an understanding of who those
characters are in the narrative.
The characterization assignment has students
use writing-to-learn in order to examine the characters and use the information
for the essay they will write about the transformation of a dynamic character
in the novel. In the
past, students have copied and pasted from internet resources such as
SparkNotes to complete the characterization. While some students realize this
is intentional plagiarism, others think that the information is so basic and
common that it is fine to copy it.
A way to change the assignment to
resist plagiarism is to change the nature of the assignment. Instead of a
straightforward assignment that calls for summary of a character’s position,
the assignment could engage in higher level thinking such as asking students to
write from the perspective of each character. They may write a brief letter
from one character to another about an issue in narrative. A reflection
assignment would focus on why the writer made the choices that they did in the
letter. The problem with this assignment maybe that students struggle to
complete it and miss the opportunity to gain a base understanding of one or
multiple characters in narrative that are important for the essay they will
write. Using Turnitin with the straightforward characterization version of the
assignment may help students engage in the true intention of the assignment,
which is the application of their ability to read and understand the narrative.
We shall see. And I
will write a blog post later in the semester to update you on what happened.